So, I bid adieu to the Casio today, returning it to Target. Turning its sleek body over in my hand, I felt some hesitation, but in the end, I think I made the right choice. I didn't save too much, net, however, since I bought some diploma frames (see Flickr page). I also didn't return the shuffle, which is happily charging off this machine even as I type. It's cute and I am excusing the impulse purchase on health grounds. It's good for working out. Now I will work out daily, better than ever, and drop 10 by Chrimbo. Believe me?
I stopped to play with some other cameras after seeing an Olympus advertised on sale. Played with this one a bit. Still not macrofied adequately for my tastes. Played with the Coolpix L3 and L6 - both had shortcomings, sadly.
Here's what I think I want most:
1.) Killer macro abilities - as good as my current coolpix 2100. Does more megapixels = decreased macro ability?
2.) Wheel-type (as opposed to digital on-screen menu) function selection. (There can still be some in the camera accessible via the menu, but you know what I mean, right?)
3.) Runs on batteries. The regular kind, not the wall-charged kind. From a practical point of view, having to stop to plug in and recharge just doesn't jive with the reasons one purchases a quality point-and-shoot. For world travelers, it's a recipe for mains-frustration. Again, my current Nikon runs for a long, long time on the special, camera quality CRV-3 battery, or passably well (and conveniently) on regular AAs.
4.) Easy macro selection. Shouldn't take more than two movements. That little flower better be stamped right on the case. I should be able to hit it, select it, and shoot. Done. Period. That bug might not be on the flower long enough for me to scroll, scroll, select, scroll, select into macro mode.
5.) More megapixels.
Is that asking too much? Someone else out there must be a macro lover like me, right? What's the heir to the Coolpix 2100? I love my Nikon a little more tonight, 1600x1200 and all. Tiny screen? No problem - it still has a view finder. Smudged lens? Okay, that should be fixed, but at least I didn't melt it with the candle shots. (again, see flickr.)
By the way: I don't need nearly as many words to describe what I want in a man. I don't need any words at all, as a matter of fact - unless you count the 1000
this description is worth.