Kevin Roderick is doing a better job than my recent Technorati searches (sorry JD) at covering relevant reactions to the LAT's series on the UFW.
I find it interesting to note that the common theme among those who object to the Times's take on the union is "where has the Times been when it had the chance to report on something good, something else having to do with labor, etc, etc."
Dangerously close to: "why don't the papers report on the new schools we're building in Iraq as much as they report the car bombs?" No? Am I wrong?
Fairness standards for geese and ganders remain disparate, it would seem.